Friday, March 29, 2013

Wine and Food Pairing - Dinner Trip to California


Coming home for the weekend, the first thing I did was go to the store and stock up on some different varietals of wine. Being Good Friday, Catholics are not allowed to eat meat; so, my family's dinner consisted of fish. Our meal consisted of baked tilapia with a lemon sauce, steamed vegetables, steamed rice, and for dessert, cake pops! All of our wines came from California; so, this meal was a little "trip" to California through fish and wine.
My niece, Lexi, excited about dinner time!
The baked tilapia with lemon sauce.
My plate!!!
                                                                              
The three types of wines that were chosen to pair with the meal were a Sauvignon Blanc, a White Zinfandel, and a Merlot. My family decided to taste all of the wines with the fish and the dessert in order to try to decide which ones paired the best since wine drinking is not a huge part of my parent’s lives. 

My plate and the three wines for tasting.
    A close up of the three wines.
The first wine we tried was the Sauvignon Blanc. This was a Sauvignon Blanc made by Mirassou winery. This wine was a 2011 vintage. It was from California. It was a pale, golden yellow color. On the nose, there was not too much of an aroma. Some members of my family were able to detect a bit of the citrus flavors which make up this wine. On the initial tasting of this wine, it was very, very bitter/pungent due to the grapefruit flavors. On its own, this would have not been a favorite wine out of any of the members of my family. When it was paired with the tilapia, it was made a little better; however, it was still not the favorite combination. With the vegetables, it added a bit of citrus, which did not help or hurt. With the cake pops, the grapefruit flavor was able to cut through some of the sweetness of the cake pops. This was a fairly good wine, but it was not the favorite of the night.


The Sauvignon Blanc's wine label    
  The bottle
                                                            
 






The second wine tried was the White Zinfandel. This White Zinfandel was made by Beringer. It was from Napa Valley, California. This wine was a nice rose color. My parents found it very interesting when I told them that all wine grapes produce a clear juice and the color comes from either keeping the skins in for a certain period of time or adding red wine after the white wine has fermented to create some of the rose color wines. This wine was very aromatic. It had a fruity and floral nose. This wine was very balanced and smooth on its own. The fruit was pronounced when trying it. With the fish, it paired very nicely. The fish was able to melt and the fruity flavors of the wine accentuated it very well. It was overall a very clean and refreshing pairing. It also paired very nicely with the cake pops! This was definitely a favorite of all of my family!!


The wine bottle
The White Zinfandel label

                                                                   
 






The third wine we tried was the Merlot. The particular bottle was a Californian Merlot from Flip Flop. The color was a nice red/berry color. On the nose, it smelt a bit like fruit jam. On the palate, it was very strong. The tannins were a bit over powering. With the fish, it was definitely too powerful. However, due to the mocha notes in the wine, some of my family and I decided to try it with a bite of the cake pops. Due to the chocolate from the cake pops and the mocha from the Merlot, it was a bit better of a combination. This was not a favorite wine of the evening though. My sister even commented that this particular wine tasted like “tar”. I would not buy this wine for this meal again, but I feel that it may better suit a meal that is red meat or spicier. 


The Merlot wine label
  The wine bottle
All in all, two of the three wines worked with the tilapia. It was interesting to see how particular varieties of wine can work so well with a particular food, while others fail to enhance the meal. My family loved the experiment and the overall experience that it created. There was definitely a lot more laughter due to the wine!! The meal was a success due to my mom’s great cooking, and the wine just added to the pleasure of the food.
A picture of myself during the tasting of the White Zinfandel!
My dad thinking about the wine he's drinking!
My sister, Mallory, enjoying the dinner and wine!
Yum, cake pops!!!

Thursday, March 28, 2013

Tasting - Emeri de Bortoli Sparkling Shiraz

Date of Tasting: March 28, 2013
Name: Emeri de Bortoli Sparkling Shiraz
Variety: Shiraz
Region: South Eastern
Country:Australia
Year:NV
Price: $9.95

Shop Review: A relatively light, fresh style of sparkling Shiraz, with berries and hints of chocolate picking up just a touch of sweet vanilla on the finish.

 My Review:  This was my first sparkling shiraz that I have ever tasted. On the nose, it had a fruity aroma. On the palate, I was able to detect some berry notes. As described in the shop review, I was able to detect some of the vanilla towards the end of tasting this wine. There were not too many bubbles for this sparkling wine, but I did like it. 

With or Without Food: Without food

Tasting - Montebuena

Date of Tasting: March 28, 2013
Name: Montebuena
Variety: 100% Tempranillo
Region: Rioja
Country:Spain
Year: 2010
Price: $8.95

Shop Review: Ripe cherry and blackcurrant on the nose and in the mouth. Pliant and seamless in texture, with good heft and back-end energy. Finishes smooth and sweet, with fine-grained tannins providing shape and grip. Still on the young side but this wine drinks very well with an hour or so of decanting; it’s an excellent value for Rioja.

 My Review: On the nose, I was able to detect cherries. When I tasted the wine, it did have the same peppery taste as the Tres Ojos Garnacha. I was able to find some of the cherry notes within the wine though. This was not one of my favorite wines of this tasting. 

With or Without Food: Without food


Tasting - Tres Ojos Garnacha

Date of Tasting: March 28, 2013
Name: Tres Ojos Garnacha
Variety: Garnacha
Region: Calatayud
Country: Spain
Year: 2011
Price: $6.95

Shop Review: The wine has a brick red color with a bouquet of red raspberries, spice and white pepper. The palate is incredibly concentrated and rich. The modern styles of Garnacha in Spain are continuously being perceived worldwide as wines of extraordinarily good quality. This wine is fruity, juicy and shows a great depth, ripe tannins, length but yet with wonderful elegance and lightness. Enjoy with sausages, roasted meats, aged cheeses etc.

 My Review: On the nose, I was able to detect some pepper from this red wine. ON the palate, I again tasted the pepper. I noticed some hints of fruit such as raspberries. Overall, I was thrown off a bit by the extremely pepper flavor and could not detect much else. 

With or Without Food: Without food

Tasting - Sainte Victoire Côtes de Provence

Date of Tasting: March 28, 2013
Name: Sainte Victoire Côtes de Provence
Variety: Grenache, Syrah, Cinsault
Region: Provenace
Country: France
Year: 2011
Price: $8.95

Shop Review: Bright salmon pink; typical of the fresh but warm Provence style. Refined and complex on the nose, with summer fruit and floral notes. Dry and crisp, with a delicate flavor and full texture.

 My Review: When this wine was poured, I was intrigued by the color. On the nose, I was able to detect some fruits such as peaches and pineapples. On the palate, I mainly tasted the peach as well as some hints of what I believed to be grapefruits. I did enjoy this wine for its fruity nature. 

With or Without Food: Without food

Tasting - Canyon Road Chardonnay

Date of Tasting: March 28, 2013
Name: Canyon Road Chardonnay
Variety: Chardonnay
Region: California
Country:USA
Year: 2011
Price: $6.95

Shop Review: Medium- bodied wine with notes of crisp apple and ripe citrus fruit with a hint of cinnamon spice. Delicious complement to grilled chicken, lighter pasta dishes or mild cheeses.

 My Review:  On the nose, this wine smelt fruity and very fresh. On the palate, I was able to detect some apple flavors as well as a hint  of oak. I overall enjoyed this wine and found it very crisp.

With or Without Food: Without food

Friday, March 22, 2013

Tasting - Potluck Sweet Malbec

Date of Tasting: March 21, 2013
Name: Potluck Sweet Malbec
Variety: Malbec
Region: Mendoza 
Country: Argentina
Year: 2010
Price: $7.95

Shop Review: Deep red brilliant with violet hints. Complex, fruity, and predominant red fruits. Easy to drink, round with persistent sweetness, very well balanced with sweet tannins.

My Review: On the nose, I detected some fruity notes. On my palate, it was a very dry wine. There were small hints of oak and spice. I thought this was an alright red wine. 

With or Without Food: Without food

Tasting - Domaine de Grange de Payan

Date of Tasting: March 21, 2013
Name: Domaine de Grange de Payan
Variety: Grenache
Region: Côtes du Rhône 
Country: France
Year: 2011
Price: $8.95

Shop Review: Intensely spicy and precise, with lively red berry flavors and a hint of black pepper. The Grenache, which makes up the majority of the wine, is deeper and more powerful, offering cherry and black raspberry qualities lifted by zesty minerality.

My Review: On the nose, this wine was full of spices. On the palate, I could not really detect any other flavors than the pepper. When I really concentrated on detecting notes other than pepper, I was able to discern a tiny bit of fruit, but it was very hidden. Overall, it was not a very pleasant wine for my palate. 

With or Without Food: Without food

Tasting - Tinto Figaro

Date of Tasting: March 21, 2013
Name: Tinto Figaro
Variety: 100% Garnacha
Region: Calatayud 
Country: Spain
Year: 2009
Price: $6.95

Shop Review: Figaro is 100% Garnacha, made from a selection of the best grapes grown in the oldest vineyards. While not truly an "oaked wine", a short stay in oak barrels provides a nice spicy flavor boost. Bright violet. Dark berry and cherry aromas show a jammy aspect. Supple and gently sweet, with good lift to its black raspberry and boysenberry flavors. Smooth and broad on the finish, leaving behind a hint of spiciness. Extremely easy to drink and an excellent value.

My Review:  On the nose, this wine had a fruity smell, and I could detect notes of what I believed to be cherries. It also had a very leathery smell, which may have been due to the oak. Upon tasting this wine, it was very dry and had a very powerful taste of oak. I was not a big fan of the oak flavor; so, I did not really enjoy this wine. 

With or Without Food: Without food

Tasting - Maipe Malbec Rosé

Date of Tasting: March 21, 2013
Name: Maipe Malbec Rosé
Variety: Malbec
Region: Mendoza 
Country: Argentina
Year: 2011
Price: $7.95

Shop Review: Intense pink color with violet hints. Fresh red fruit bouquet, strawberry and cherry flavors, balanced acidity, dry and lingering finish. Excellent with tuna or green salad, pasta, spicy Asian dishes.

My Review: On the nose, this wine smelt a little bit like strawberries. I did detect an aroma that reminded me more of a strong red wine rather than the rose wine which this is. On the palate, it was very sweet. I did not care for the taste of this wine. I found it very overpowering which I was not expecting. It was fairly dry also. 

With or Without Food: Without food

Tasting - Cortenova Pinot Grigio

Date of Tasting: March 21, 2013
Name: Cortenova Pinot Grigio
Variety: Pinot Grigio
Region: Veneto
 Country: Italy
Year: 2012
Price: $7.95

Shop Review: Brilliant straw color with emerald reflections. Fresh and floral bouquet with a hint of pears, apricots and bananas. Fresh and inviting with bright fruit and an easy drinking style with a pleasing hint of almonds in the aftertaste. Pairs well with seafood dishes, risottos with scampi, spaghetti with clams, sole in white wine Perfect also as an aperitif.

My Review:  This wine smelled very sweet, which instantly had me excited to try this wine since my novice palate still enjoys the sweeter wines. Upon tasting the wine, I noticed hints of fruit, particularly apples. I thought this was a pretty good Pinot Grigio, and I enjoyed the wine.

With or Without Food: Without food

Wednesday, March 20, 2013

Film Review - Wine for the Confused



            In class on Thursday, March 7, a film was played for us to enjoy. The film picked out was Wine for the Confused, which features the celebrity John Cleese. I actually had not seen John Cleese in a fairly long time; so, this wine film was interesting in order to get used to his unique style. This film is a very short documentary meant for people who want to get into wine but may be scared by the overwhelming number of different wines. Wine for the Confused gave the basics on three types of white wines and three types of red wines and offered basic facts and definitions of common words used in the wine industry. Overall, this documentary simplified a majority of the information which I had already learned in Geography of Wine.
            The film begins by John Cleese explaining that wine can be scary. This is exacerbated by some people who are very familiar with wine often acting in a snobbish manner and not fully helping a new wine drinker gain the knowledge which is important for them to decipher which types of wines they enjoy and which wines they do not. He stressed the point to not let someone else dictate what type of wine you like. Instead of letting someone tell you that you will like a particular style, a person can use key words that are common throughout wines that they have enjoyed. These key words will allow for a sommelier or anyone else to be able to find a wine which will suit their particular palate.
            John Cleese next goes into talking about three common white wine grapes. The first white wine grape John discussed was Riesling. In the past, it was believed that all Rieslings were sweet. This caused this particular variety of wine to lose popularity in the 80s and 90s. However, due to manipulating the fermentation process when creating the wines, Rieslings can be “dry”. A “dry” wine simply means that it has no residual sugar left within it. Wine for the Confused helped those who were not familiar with the term “dry” by inserting a definition within a box on the documentary. While this was almost elementary for me, since I already knew what a “dry” wine was, I realized that this would be imperative for a person who is just starting out in wine and does not have the educational background which I have gained from Geography of Wine.
            The next white wine grape which the documentary discussed was Sauvignon Blanc. The documentary stressed how this variety is almost always acidic and more dry than a Riesling. However, due to the fruity flavor, many wine drinkers perceive the Sauvignon Blanc as having a sweetness to it. The particular wine maker, which John Cleese toured at, went into talking about the small concentrated grapes which are used to make this type of wine. These grape bunches are further manipulated by not watering the vines regularly and snipping off excess bunches.
            The third white wine grape shown in Wine for the Confused was Chardonnay. John Cleese went out to Barrow Winery in order to learn more about this particular variety. I really did enjoy John Cleese going out to different vineyards since I felt it would allow someone who has never seen a wine vineyard to gain more knowledge on what they actually look like and how the wine makers proceed in creating these varieties of wine. For the particular Chardonnay which was tried in the documentary, it had the descriptors of round, rich, lush, and creamy. These descriptors are often found from a Chardonnary which has undergone a second fermentation called “malolactic fermentation”. Again, Wine for the Confused put up a box with a definition for “malolactic fermentation”.
            In between talking about the three common white wine grapes and the three common red wine grapes, the documentary went back to the outdoor party. John Cleese performed an experiment to see if wine drinkers could tell if they were drinking a red wine or white wine just by taste. I found this extremely interesting since the results showed that it almost could not be detected by regular wine drinkers whether they were having a red wine or a white wine.
            The documentary then went on to discuss the three common red wine grapes, starting with Pinot Noir. This wine is a very deep color with a peppery taste. The particular wine maker which John Cleese talked to told us that this wine grape is one of the most difficult grapes to grow but when it is done right it is fantastic.
            The next red wine grape was Merlot. The particular Merlot John Cleese tried was from the Australian Outback. This wine had a plum and cherry flavor. The word “vintage” appeared during this discussion. Again, a box defining what “vintage” is appeared on the screen to reiterate what the documentary had already said about it being how you taste the weather in the wine and every year is different for this agricultural product.
            The final red wine grape tried was Cabernet Sauvignon. This came from the Foxen winery. This wine has lots of tannins which allow the Cabernet Sauvignon to have a long life. The term “terroir” came up while discussing this particular wine and how the soil can drastically affect the flavor of the wine.
            Next, Wine for the Confused moved into a restaurant setting in order to explain how to order a wine off of a menu. John Cleese told us that wine prices are often marked up 2 ½ times their wholesale price. Also, John Cleese did an experiment at an outdoor party to show that to some people a $5 bottle of wine can taste like at $200 bottle; so, once again, wine drinkers must trust their own palates. John Cleese ends the documentary by briefly going over wine storage. Wine should be at a constant temperature (less than 60 degrees), avoid sunlight, and avoid vibration. There are various wine glasses, but an all-purpose wine glass usually works just fine.
            Overall, I felt this was a fairly good documentary for people who are just getting into wines. Since I had already learned most of the information from Geography of Wine, I felt like it was almost a “wine for dummies” documentary. I would recommend this documentary to people who do not have any wine knowledge so that they can feel less intimated by the vast majority of wines out there.